Fortunately, people who discovered that identity was first of all
cultural and marked by traces of a historical self have now devoted
their lives to recovering the good in the identities they once shared
and learned so much from.Such
is the case with the musicologists and musicians of Turkey today. All
are aware that the wisdom of the many colors and cultures of Turkey's
multifaceted Ottoman past needs to be recovered in a musical, cultural
manner. There is not one choir in İstanbul that does not
incorporate, for example, a Circassian, Armenian or Georgian song in
its repertoire. After all, this country, once upon a time, was actually
multicultural without even "trying"; simply because it was. Watching a
Karagöz play (traditional Anatolian shadow puppets) just once would
reveal how a gypsy, a Jew, a male dancer (köçek), an Armenian, a Greek
and an Arab could live so close together that there was nothing more
ordinary than for all their voices to be heard as characters and songs
in a Karagöz play. I was happy to hear that Aram Kerovpyan, a
musician and a musicologist who has devoted his life to Armenian
liturgical chant and particularly the modal system of this form of
chanting, was going to come to İstanbul from Paris, where he now lives,
and give a workshop on liturgical chanting. This is a very exciting
thing for anyone who appreciates maqam music in Turkey, not just for
singers. Kerovpyan is a well-known and highly sought-after
musician in music circles in Turkey. Each time he comes from Paris to
his hometown of İstanbul people try not to miss his lectures and talks.
As a youth, he received liturgical chant training in the Armenian
Church. He learned to play the kanoun and studied the Middle Eastern
music system with master musician Saadeddin Öktenay. In 1977 he moved
to Paris, where he devoted himself entirely to music, playing with
various Middle Eastern musicians. In 1980 he joined the Ensemble de
Musique Arménienne, which later became the ensemble Kotchnak. From this
date on, Armenian music became his principle field of research,
particularly the modal system of liturgical chant. In 1985 he formed
Akn, an Armenian liturgical chant ensemble. Parallel to his activities
as a musician, he participates in conferences, seminars and lectures in
Europe and in North America and regularly publishes articles on the
subject of Armenian modal music theory With the same excitement I
get when I am about to decipher a mystery happening under my nose, I
joined my friends to go to his workshop. It was (and will continue to
be until July 28) held in a rather less-than-atmospheric concert and
rehearsal hall within the Armenian high school in Harbiye. We gathered
together, sat in a circle and started to chant under Kerovpyan's
supervision and direction. Most of us were musicians coming from
diverse disciplines -- from bossa nova to baroque Music and from maqam
to rembetiko. But there we were, supposedly to forget all we knew
before about the modal system of maqam music that had to do with exact
measurements of microtones and modalities of those microtones in
ascending and descending order with their transitions in different
scales. We were to forget about all this technical stuff, even what we
knew about singing, and then rediscover singing and the modalities of
maqam music in our very own speaking tone from the natural harmony of
the sounds we make while speaking or merely chanting a draw note. The
tuning fork is such an artistic figure in such circumstances; that
pocket-sized object is the "keeper" of the "A" note, as if it is a
spirit between whose lips the absolute word concerning all matters of
life and death are to be heard. Thus, we took
Kerovpyan-the-tuning-fork's word -- an "A" basically -- and spread it
among ourselves as a draw note. As we sang along following Kerovpyan
all these microtones were happening, almost without notice, in a most
natural way. This was totally new to most of us, because we are
normally taught to look at what is written and try to strike these
notes without necessarily situating them within a united picture of
sounds. So Kerovpyan's descriptions of sounds in a much more
down-to-earth way that felt somehow connected to real life made much
more sense for understanding the modal system. He would define the
ascendances and coming back to draw note, saying, "Come on, when you
put a plate on the table, you don't drop it or knock it against the
table, you simply place it down safely and slowly on the table, don't
you?" As you can imagine, that made much more sense than saying, "Now
come back to the tonic." Being there, connecting with a wisdom
that so belonged here before the atrocities of the 20th century, made
me feel so enriched and lucky to reconnect with the sounds of music we
hear everyday. Even our pop songs have maqams; that is, they are modal
music somewhat ridiculously accompanied by Western chords. We learned
to hear music in a profoundly different way, as it was heard in the
history of liturgical chant in the Armenian Church. There, questions
like polyphony or heterophony, the hotly debated issues of Turkish
maqam music today, find their own answers naturally, in a context that
exemplifies how it is "use" and nothing else that ultimately answers
all such questions in a practical way. |